Why we are, as we are
As the 150th anniversary of the publication of “On The
Origin of Species” approaches, the moment has come to ask how Darwin’s insights can be used profitably by
policymakers
The Economist, 18/12/08
Extract:
“WEALTH,
according to H.L. Mencken, an American satirist of the last century, “is any
income that is at least $100 more a year than the income of one's wife's
sister's husband.” Adjusted for inflation since 1949, that is not a bad definition.
But why do those who are already well-off feel the need to out-earn other
people? And why, contrariwise, is it so hard to abolish poverty?
America, Mencken's homeland, executes around 40
people a year for murder. Yet it still has a high murder rate. Why do people
murder each other when they are almost always caught and may, in America at
least, be killed themselves as a result?
Why, after 80
years of votes for women, and 40 years of the feminist revolution, do men still
earn larger incomes? And why do so many people hate others merely for having
different coloured skin?
Traditionally, the answers to such questions, and many
others about modern life, have been sought in philosophy, sociology, even
religion. But the answers that have come back are generally unsatisfying. They
describe, rather than explain. They do not get to the nitty-gritty of what it
truly is to be human. Policy based on them does not work. This is because they
ignore the forces that made people what they are: the forces of evolution.”
No comments:
Post a Comment